Award Abstract # 1702914
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Market concentration, skill segregation, and rising wage inequality

NSF Org: SES
Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
Recipient: PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Initial Amendment Date: March 23, 2017
Latest Amendment Date: March 23, 2017
Award Number: 1702914
Award Instrument: Standard Grant
Program Manager: Toby Parcel
SES
 Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
SBE
 Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
Start Date: July 1, 2017
End Date: June 30, 2018 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $11,955.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $11,955.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2017 = $11,955.00
History of Investigator:
  • Bruce Western (Principal Investigator)
    bw2562@columbia.edu
  • Nathan Wilmers (Co-Principal Investigator)
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Harvard University
1033 MASSACHUSETTS AVE STE 3
CAMBRIDGE
MA  US  02138-5366
(617)495-5501
Sponsor Congressional District: 05
Primary Place of Performance: Harvard University
33 Kirkland St
Cambridge
MA  US  02141-2044
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
07
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): LN53LCFJFL45
Parent UEI:
NSF Program(s): Sociology
Primary Program Source: 01001718DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
Program Reference Code(s): 1331, 9179
Program Element Code(s): 133100
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.075

ABSTRACT

Pay differences between a company's managers and its workers are striking, and much studied, but the rise in inequality over the last 40 years has come mostly from growing differences between people working at different employers, not between those working together. This fact is hard to explain for theories that explain inequality with differences in workers' education levels: even similarly-educated workers get paid differently depending on which companies they end up working at. This project instead aims to explain rising inequality by measuring changes in the intensity of competition between rival companies and changes in the balance of power between buyer and supplier companies. By studying the sources of pay differences between workplaces, this project points to a novel set of employer-targeted policies to address rising wage inequality. The research proposed here could help assess how antitrust enforcement, competition policy and product market regulation affect the wage structure. Advocates and policy makers alike have neglected these indirect policy determinants of inequality.

To clarify the sources of rising between-firm inequality, this project brings insights from economic sociology to the analysis of inequality. It builds on and reformulates the structuralist sociology of wages to ask how hierarchical relations between firms can affect wage inequality. Changes in market power are expected to affect inequality by shifting the allocation of good jobs and high wages across different employers. Specifically, the project uses establishment-level and linked employer-employee data to test several contributing sources of changing relations between firms. First, it considers whether shifting product market power has benefited some firms and workers and undermined others. Second, it asks how the reliance of supplier firms on powerful corporate buyers affects suppliers? workers? wages. Finally, it tests whether trends in educational and occupational segregation across workplaces contribute to rising inequality. More broadly, it asks about the consequences of the structured nature of product markets for the distribution of wages: if businesses operate in settings that depart from the assumptions of perfect markets, what are the consequences for their workers? wages?

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

Wilmers, Nathan "Wage Stagnation and Buyer Power: How Buyer-Supplier Relations Affect U.S. Workers? Wages, 1978 to 2014" American Sociological Review , v.83 , 2018 10.1177/0003122418762441 Citation Details

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

Project Summary

Nathan Wilmers completed this research for his dissertation titled "The New Economic Segmentation: Work, Inequality, and Market Power."  This dissertation considers how changes in organizations and product markets contributed to rising earnings inequality and wage stagnation since the 1970s.

The first chapter investigates the product market context in which employers impose wage pressure on workers.  Employers in industries that used to provide relatively high-paying jobs for workers without a college degree, like manufacturing, warehousing and transportation, have become increasingly reliant on sales to large corporate buyers.  These buyers pressure their suppliers to lower their prices and wages.  This effective pressure undermines the organizational pay premiums that workers in these sectors would otherwise enjoy.  Increased buyer power explains around 10% of wage stagnation since the 1970s.

The second chapter zooms in on within-organization processes to consider the effects of job reorganization on earnings inequality.  Wilmers finds that when tasks are more divided across high- and low-paying positions, within-organization earnings inequality increases.  This increased inequality results both from less mixing of higher and lower paid tasks across jobs and from lower earnings stemming from job homogeneity.

Finally the third chapter considers the effects of workers’ earnings growth of the changing role played by organizations in worker mobility.  Since at least the early 1990s, there has been a decline in the rate between-employer job switching among workers.  Job mobility inside organizations has held steady.  As such, a growing proportion of job mobility happens inside firms.


Intellectual Merit

Wilmers finds that increased inequality since the 1970s stems in part from a changing organizational and product market context.  Each study in the dissertation examines wage setting in a context in which rules and norms no longer shield workers from dislocation and wage pressure as they once did.  Insofar as deviations from competitive labor market wages still affect the wage structure, it is often in the direction of lower and less equal wages: jobs can be transformed, workers dislocated, and real wages lowered.  Despite this changed context, the dissertation demonstrates the continued relevance of sociological approaches to the labor market.  Returning to dual labor market theory, internal labor markets and labor process theory--sociological approaches to labor markets that have been largely dormant since the 1980s--allows new predictions about the wage effects of market power, the organizational setting of worker mobility and the inequality implications of constructing jobs out of tasks.  By testing these theories in a context of substantially different employment relations, several problems with these approaches are clarified: for example, the importance of buyer, not just seller, product market power in wage determination and the polarizing, rather than purely deskilling, effects of task distillation. 

Broader Impacts

Wilmers disseminated these findings at the American Sociological Association annual meeting; the Economic Sociology/Organizations, Occupations and Work mini-conference, the Academy of Management annual meeting and the RC28 Social Stratification and Mobility ummer meeting.  Results from one chapter of the dissertation have been published in the American Sociological Review and covered by the Boston Globe and the Washington Center for Equitable Growth's Equitablog.


Last Modified: 07/02/2018
Modified by: Nathan Wilmers

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page