IMPORTANT
NORMAL AND IMPORTANT
ABNORMAL AND IMPORTANT
Usage of “alternative
facts” and “fake news”
Immigration ban
Immigration raids
and roundups
False claims about voter fraud
Gorsuch Supreme
Court nomination
Conflicts of interest
Tweeting about
foreign affairs
Publicly criticizing
federal judges
Choices of
cabinet members
Bannon on
the N.S.C.
Flynn and Russia
Abandoning the Trans-Pacific
Trade partnership (T.P.P.)
Characterization
of media as enemies
An executive order for a border wall with Mexico
Accepting call from
Taiwanese president
ABNORMAL
National security meeting in public at Mar-a-Lago
NORMAL
Informal discussions with foreign governments before inauguration with no briefing
Potentially
alienating
Australia
Kellyanne Conway’s promotion of Ivanka Trump’s brand in a Fox News interview
Firing the acting attorney
general Sally Yates
NORMAL AND NOT IMPORTANT
ABNORMAL AND NOT IMPORTANT
NOT IMPORTANT
IMPORTANT
NORMAL AND IMPORTANT
ABNORMAL AND IMPORTANT
Usage of “alternative
facts” and “fake news”
Immigration ban
Immigration raids
and roundups
False claims about voter fraud
Gorsuch Supreme
Court nomination
Conflicts of interest
Tweeting about
foreign affairs
Publicly criticizing
federal judges
Choices of
cabinet members
Bannon on
the N.S.C.
Flynn and Russia
Abandoning the Trans-Pacific
Trade partnership (T.P.P.)
Characterization
of media as enemies
An executive order for a border wall with Mexico
Accepting call from
Taiwanese president
National security meeting in public at Mar-a-Lago
ABNORMAL
NORMAL
Informal discussions with foreign governments before inauguration with no briefing
Potentially
alienating
Australia
Kellyanne Conway’s promotion of Ivanka Trump’s brand in a Fox News interview
Firing the acting attorney
general Sally Yates
NORMAL AND NOT IMPORTANT
ABNORMAL AND NOT IMPORTANT
NOT IMPORTANT
It’s understandable if President Trump’s first month in office has left your head spinning, given the pace of news, the middle-of-the-night Twitter posts and the vows to upend Washington.
To help us get our bearings, we asked experts across the ideological spectrum — people who have served in government or studied the way governments work — to rate 20 news events for importance and abnormality. More often than not, the administration’s actions have been both highly unusual and highly consequential, The Upshot’s 15 survey panelists said.
We asked our panelists: Was the event normal, like the veto of a bill in a prior administration? Or was it highly unusual in contemporary American democracy, like ordering newspapers to suspend publication of the Pentagon Papers? Also, was it unimportant, with limited or no consequences for federal policy, like the menu for a state dinner? Or was it important, creating lasting and significant changes in policy, like the establishment of Social Security?
On average, more than half the events were rated abnormal and important. The most extreme instances, they said, were the immigration ban; the use of falsehoods; and the president’s business conflicts of interest. The Supreme Court nomination and immigration raids were on average considered normal but important. The experts thought just two of the events would have limited or no policy consequences: the firing of the acting attorney general and Kellyanne Conway’s promotion of Ivanka Trump’s products.
Below are all 20 items, grouped by their quadrant on our reality-check matrix.
Abnormal and important events
An executive order barring immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries as well as refugees from Syria
Falsehoods about topics like illegal voters and inauguration crowd size; using language like “alternative facts” and “fake news” to discuss indisputable events
Unfounded allegations of voter fraud in the general election
An array of possible conflicts of interest (incomplete divesting; having his children take over business operations; having a son-in-law in a senior role in the White House)
Tweeting independently on national security and foreign affairs issues
An executive order giving Stephen Bannon a full seat on the National Security Council and downgrading the roles of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the director of national intelligence
Publicly criticizing federal judges
Lies by the national security adviser, Michael Flynn, about discussing sanctions with a Russian official
An executive order for a border wall with Mexico
Having a senior strategist call the press “the opposition” and tell the news media to “keep its mouth shut”
Breaking tradition with decades of foreign policy by accepting a call from the president of Taiwan, though later telling the president of China he would honor the “One China” policy
Coordinating the U.S. response to a North Korea missile test in a public, unsecured location at the Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida
Informal discussions with foreign governments before being inaugurated and without prior briefing
Normal and important events
Immigration raids and roundups by Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Nominating Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court
Choices of cabinet members
Abandoning the Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty
Abnormal and unimportant events
Potentially alienating Australia, one of the U.S.’s strongest allies
Kellyanne Conway’s promotion of Ivanka Trump’s brand in a Fox News interview
Normal and unimportant events
Firing the acting attorney general Sally Yates
If you’d like to try this survey, we’ve made a public version using a Google form. We'll publish readers' average ratings, keeping each contribution anonymous.
How We Made Our Matrix
We built the list of events based on news coverage of the first month of the Trump administration in The Times and elsewhere. We created our expert panel based on recommendations from four political scientists, as well as on research of people who had experience serving in past administrations, and we aimed for diversity of thought and background. We know our panel is small and does not reflect every point of view, but we feel it represents a useful guide to developments by people with deep experience studying or serving in government.
For our survey, we asked the experts to rate each event on a scale of 1 to 5 according to how normal or abnormal they thought it was, and on a scale of 1 to 5 according to how unimportant or important they thought it was. We gave them examples of each to standardize their answers, and invited them to explain why they evaluated the event the way they did. The survey was conducted in February.
Special thanks to the political scientists at Bright Line Watch for their help on the list of experts and the survey design.